In this 2018 GDC session, Spry Fox‘s Daniel Cook explains how to keep human beings from being treated as interchangeable, disposable, or abusable when designing multiplayer games.
If you’re developing, or thinking about developing a multiplayer game, this is a great talk to better understand the challenges of designing multiplayer interactions that result in more engagement and player satisfaction.
Daniel talks about the potentially negative social effects of multiplayer implementations, the effects of proximity, propinquity, serendipity, and density on people’s relationships, the logistics of forming new friendships in games out of strangers.
He covers basics like persistent identities (and repeat encounters), events (and their density), daily incentives, and offline communities as well as anti-patterns such as anonymous players, empty spaces, too many gameplay modes, and separation of players by skill. He also talks about the challenges of matches and matchmaking, which often necessitate large amounts of concurrent players to be viable, and the issue of matchmaking queue churn, resulting in low repeat interactions. The talk also covers the topic of similarities; tribalism, nationalism, their negative effects, and how to work with similarities in a positive context through fictional places and cultures. Daniel speaks to reciprocity, how it levels up relationships by building trust for more meaningful and deeper interactions, and the challenges of building trust, which is easily destroyed by cheating, scamming, or even premature disclosure which then kills relationship leveling.
I think the whole talk is fantastic, but the friendship levels of solitary play, parallel play, ambient/accidental coop, soft coop, and hard coop, are something any multiplayer game designer should think about because designing games around those different levels can have far-reaching effects and give games the proper appeal they need to grow and thrive.
The low trust, medium trust, and high trust Venn diagrams of increasingly more discrete player skills can also be found on Raph Koster’s website in his post about The Trust Spectrum. It’s a great read. The topics apply to all games, but it makes me appreciate Deep Rock Galactic even more for its well-thought-out design.
I find it funny that Daniel calls out retrofitting a social architecture as hard because I define architecture fundamentally as “that which is difficult to change later.” The context or nature of the architecture is usually less important.
New to Godot Engine? Want to get started creating awesome games quickly? Just use AI! AI learns (is trained) from online content (which is a whole separate topic). As a result, the quality of the answers the AI provides is based on the volume and variety of content available to learn from. Since Godot is …
A new version of the Inventory System is available. This version requires Godot Engine 4.3 and includes many refinements. New Drag and Drop system The Drag-and-Drop component has received a major overhaul. The previous system was quite complex and the separation of the classes that implemented the click-and-drag and click-and-release approaches had so much overlap …
Here’s a tutorial on how to create breakable objects in Blender and Godot. It covers the steps needed to design and implement breakable objects, including scripting and using physics properties to make objects break apart into smaller pieces upon collision or other interactions.
Design Patterns for Building Friendships
In this 2018 GDC session, Spry Fox‘s Daniel Cook explains how to keep human beings from being treated as interchangeable, disposable, or abusable when designing multiplayer games.
If you’re developing, or thinking about developing a multiplayer game, this is a great talk to better understand the challenges of designing multiplayer interactions that result in more engagement and player satisfaction.
Daniel talks about the potentially negative social effects of multiplayer implementations, the effects of proximity, propinquity, serendipity, and density on people’s relationships, the logistics of forming new friendships in games out of strangers.
He covers basics like persistent identities (and repeat encounters), events (and their density), daily incentives, and offline communities as well as anti-patterns such as anonymous players, empty spaces, too many gameplay modes, and separation of players by skill. He also talks about the challenges of matches and matchmaking, which often necessitate large amounts of concurrent players to be viable, and the issue of matchmaking queue churn, resulting in low repeat interactions. The talk also covers the topic of similarities; tribalism, nationalism, their negative effects, and how to work with similarities in a positive context through fictional places and cultures. Daniel speaks to reciprocity, how it levels up relationships by building trust for more meaningful and deeper interactions, and the challenges of building trust, which is easily destroyed by cheating, scamming, or even premature disclosure which then kills relationship leveling.
I think the whole talk is fantastic, but the friendship levels of solitary play, parallel play, ambient/accidental coop, soft coop, and hard coop, are something any multiplayer game designer should think about because designing games around those different levels can have far-reaching effects and give games the proper appeal they need to grow and thrive.
The low trust, medium trust, and high trust Venn diagrams of increasingly more discrete player skills can also be found on Raph Koster’s website in his post about The Trust Spectrum. It’s a great read. The topics apply to all games, but it makes me appreciate Deep Rock Galactic even more for its well-thought-out design.
I find it funny that Daniel calls out retrofitting a social architecture as hard because I define architecture fundamentally as “that which is difficult to change later.” The context or nature of the architecture is usually less important.
This talk also reminds me of Penny Arcade’s Greater Internet F***wad Theory, which is soon coming up on its 20th anniversary.
Related Posts
Creating games with Godot Engine using AI
New to Godot Engine? Want to get started creating awesome games quickly? Just use AI! AI learns (is trained) from online content (which is a whole separate topic). As a result, the quality of the answers the AI provides is based on the volume and variety of content available to learn from. Since Godot is …
Inventory System v1.16 available
A new version of the Inventory System is available. This version requires Godot Engine 4.3 and includes many refinements. New Drag and Drop system The Drag-and-Drop component has received a major overhaul. The previous system was quite complex and the separation of the classes that implemented the click-and-drag and click-and-release approaches had so much overlap …
Inventory System v1.1 available
Hot on the heels of 1.0, version 1.1 allows for gaps in the inventory. This release also correctly bakes the release version into the PDF Guide.
Making breakable objects in Godot
Here’s a tutorial on how to create breakable objects in Blender and Godot. It covers the steps needed to design and implement breakable objects, including scripting and using physics properties to make objects break apart into smaller pieces upon collision or other interactions.