In this 2018 GDC session, Spry Fox‘s Daniel Cook explains how to keep human beings from being treated as interchangeable, disposable, or abusable when designing multiplayer games.
If you’re developing, or thinking about developing a multiplayer game, this is a great talk to better understand the challenges of designing multiplayer interactions that result in more engagement and player satisfaction.
Daniel talks about the potentially negative social effects of multiplayer implementations, the effects of proximity, propinquity, serendipity, and density on people’s relationships, the logistics of forming new friendships in games out of strangers.
He covers basics like persistent identities (and repeat encounters), events (and their density), daily incentives, and offline communities as well as anti-patterns such as anonymous players, empty spaces, too many gameplay modes, and separation of players by skill. He also talks about the challenges of matches and matchmaking, which often necessitate large amounts of concurrent players to be viable, and the issue of matchmaking queue churn, resulting in low repeat interactions. The talk also covers the topic of similarities; tribalism, nationalism, their negative effects, and how to work with similarities in a positive context through fictional places and cultures. Daniel speaks to reciprocity, how it levels up relationships by building trust for more meaningful and deeper interactions, and the challenges of building trust, which is easily destroyed by cheating, scamming, or even premature disclosure which then kills relationship leveling.
I think the whole talk is fantastic, but the friendship levels of solitary play, parallel play, ambient/accidental coop, soft coop, and hard coop, are something any multiplayer game designer should think about because designing games around those different levels can have far-reaching effects and give games the proper appeal they need to grow and thrive.
The low trust, medium trust, and high trust Venn diagrams of increasingly more discrete player skills can also be found on Raph Koster’s website in his post about The Trust Spectrum. It’s a great read. The topics apply to all games, but it makes me appreciate Deep Rock Galactic even more for its well-thought-out design.
I find it funny that Daniel calls out retrofitting a social architecture as hard because I define architecture fundamentally as “that which is difficult to change later.” The context or nature of the architecture is usually less important.
This release finally uses Godot Engine 4.4. It adds the GGCraftingSystem singleton and updates the GGInteractable2DStrategyCrafting class to use it. The crafting editor nodes now have prefixes, which makes it much easier to search for specific recipe or item nodes in larger crafting libraries. Some syntactic sugar was added as well. You can now easily …
The latest version of the inventory system is available and includes refinements for the interaction demo and the main tour. New features: We’ve also got a handful of bug fixes:
Here’s a tutorial on how to create breakable objects in Blender and Godot. It covers the steps needed to design and implement breakable objects, including scripting and using physics properties to make objects break apart into smaller pieces upon collision or other interactions.
Are you using @onready to reference nodes? There’s a better way! Here’s a simple example of how many tutorials use @onready to reference nodes: That script is attached to a CanvasLayer node with a ProgressBar called HealthBar. And yet, when running the scene, it will throw an error: This is because there’s actually a spelling …
Design Patterns for Building Friendships
In this 2018 GDC session, Spry Fox‘s Daniel Cook explains how to keep human beings from being treated as interchangeable, disposable, or abusable when designing multiplayer games.
If you’re developing, or thinking about developing a multiplayer game, this is a great talk to better understand the challenges of designing multiplayer interactions that result in more engagement and player satisfaction.
Daniel talks about the potentially negative social effects of multiplayer implementations, the effects of proximity, propinquity, serendipity, and density on people’s relationships, the logistics of forming new friendships in games out of strangers.
He covers basics like persistent identities (and repeat encounters), events (and their density), daily incentives, and offline communities as well as anti-patterns such as anonymous players, empty spaces, too many gameplay modes, and separation of players by skill. He also talks about the challenges of matches and matchmaking, which often necessitate large amounts of concurrent players to be viable, and the issue of matchmaking queue churn, resulting in low repeat interactions. The talk also covers the topic of similarities; tribalism, nationalism, their negative effects, and how to work with similarities in a positive context through fictional places and cultures. Daniel speaks to reciprocity, how it levels up relationships by building trust for more meaningful and deeper interactions, and the challenges of building trust, which is easily destroyed by cheating, scamming, or even premature disclosure which then kills relationship leveling.
I think the whole talk is fantastic, but the friendship levels of solitary play, parallel play, ambient/accidental coop, soft coop, and hard coop, are something any multiplayer game designer should think about because designing games around those different levels can have far-reaching effects and give games the proper appeal they need to grow and thrive.
The low trust, medium trust, and high trust Venn diagrams of increasingly more discrete player skills can also be found on Raph Koster’s website in his post about The Trust Spectrum. It’s a great read. The topics apply to all games, but it makes me appreciate Deep Rock Galactic even more for its well-thought-out design.
I find it funny that Daniel calls out retrofitting a social architecture as hard because I define architecture fundamentally as “that which is difficult to change later.” The context or nature of the architecture is usually less important.
This talk also reminds me of Penny Arcade’s Greater Internet F***wad Theory, which is soon coming up on its 20th anniversary.
Related Posts
Inventory System 2 Alpha 4 available
This release finally uses Godot Engine 4.4. It adds the GGCraftingSystem singleton and updates the GGInteractable2DStrategyCrafting class to use it. The crafting editor nodes now have prefixes, which makes it much easier to search for specific recipe or item nodes in larger crafting libraries. Some syntactic sugar was added as well. You can now easily …
Inventory System v1.5 available
The latest version of the inventory system is available and includes refinements for the interaction demo and the main tour. New features: We’ve also got a handful of bug fixes:
Making breakable objects in Godot
Here’s a tutorial on how to create breakable objects in Blender and Godot. It covers the steps needed to design and implement breakable objects, including scripting and using physics properties to make objects break apart into smaller pieces upon collision or other interactions.
Ditch @onready, use @export instead
Are you using @onready to reference nodes? There’s a better way! Here’s a simple example of how many tutorials use @onready to reference nodes: That script is attached to a CanvasLayer node with a ProgressBar called HealthBar. And yet, when running the scene, it will throw an error: This is because there’s actually a spelling …